Thursday, October 20, 2016

Op-Ed Regarding The Importance of the Peaceful Transition of Power and why it is the reason American Democracy has worked for 240 years.

Op-Ed Regarding The Importance of the Peaceful Transition of Power and why it is the reason American Democracy has worked for 240 years.

As recorded via LIVE broadcast:  https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=10210271784611975&id=1261603564

By:  J. Dean Grimes
10/20/2016

It frightens me that presidential candidate Donald Trump incites mild violence at his rallies.  It frightens me that he is well known for being disrespectful to women, is pro repealing Rowe v. Wade, that he is a bully, and it frightens me that he is a misogynistic power hungry man who is only in the presidential race to please himself, not the American people.  However, I am absolutely petrified about the fact that on both September 30th, and then openly in the last presidential debate, Trump very plainly stated that he would contest the validity of the election results if he loses the election. 

Here’s why:
The peaceful transition of power from one president to the next is the foundation upon that which makes America’s democracy work.  Why?  Because American voters have the right to elections that are fair, that are peaceful, and that truly reflect the way that American democracy represents the people, for the people, and by the people.  We all know that the electoral college, and the supreme court have interfered in elections in our past [Bush / Gore], but despite whether we agreed as a nation about the outcome of controversial elections in our past, Americans have rallied around our new president because a peaceful transition of power has taken place. 

America is founded on the principle that all beings are created equal.  Creating divisiveness, openly stating that you will contest election results, asking supporters to incite mild or actual violence in protest of this principle will send our great nation into a time before the feudal system and the dark ages of kingships and autocratic rulers.  We all know what happened when Germany was thrown into chaos after World War I, and a new party called the Nazi party came into power, and a megalomaniac ruler that sent tens of thousands of people to death camps for no other reason than their ethnicity came into power. 

It is with the aforementioned thought in mind that I ask the American people this: 
Do we want to live in a new era of dictatorship led by a man who doesn’t believe in the core values of our constitution let alone understand them?  Further, if a man like this can come into such a powerful position of leadership, what does that say about America?  Are we falling into the same traps that ancient Rome fell into as they crumbled into oblivion?  Or are we going to stand up to the bullies and focus on our common belief that peace is in the best interest of everyone, that education brings purpose to all people, and that purpose creates prosperity not only for Americans, but people across the globe. 

It is with this in mind, as we move closer to election day, that I urge American’s to consider what and who they are really voting for, what the true outcome will be, and to consider that the foundations of our constitution are what truly make America great.  Additionally, I urge Americans to think about what separates the United States democratic system from any other governmental system in the world:  The peaceful transition of power from one president to another.  We must believe in our system.  We must unite.  We must believe in ourselves, believe in each other, and acknowledge that each American is afforded the right to voice their opinion ONLY because America is already great. 

In this election, it is essential that Americans come together and unite as one.  We must not only  believe that our democracy actually works because we have the guaranteed right to speak freely, elect our leaders freely, and allows for the opportuniy to shout with one loud voice!  Use your voice to stand up for your right to America’s brand of democracy – which allows for the peaceful transition of power, delivers a voice to all people, gives everyone an opportunity to prosper, and through the prosperity of these founding ideals, gives purpose to our domestic policies, and to our policies abroad.

This election your voice counts  because your voice will determine the outcome of our future as Americans more than any other time in our 240 year history. 

Get out and vote.  It counts.

I urge you to watch the entire third and final presidential debate here:

https://youtu.be/3lam80oE7to

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Regarding Yemen as written for Prof. Brennan Legasse, Sierra Nevada College

Regarding Yemen’s History:

Yemen is located east of the Red Sea, South of Saudi Arabia, North of Somalia, West of Oman,
which I like to call “Oh Man!” because both states are located in a hotbed of terrorist activity, ruthless
oil regimes, a great fishing location, and an ideal port for US Naval ships (other countries such as Russia
also highly value Yemen for this reason as well), and an even better port for land invasions for any army
or military. The result is a history that has been plagued with invasion, corrupt governments, civil
unrest, terrorist activity, and a nation that has no true identity.
Regarding Population, GDP and other statistics.

Yemen is home to 26 million people, is a desert country, and the largest city is Sana’a, which is
the nation’s capital, and the primary seaport is Aden. Arabic is Yemen’s official language. Yemen has a
history of violent uprisings due to secessionists, unruly tribes, and Islamic extremists. President Ali
Abdullah Saleh was forced to resign in 2011 and power was transferred to Abd Rabbuh Mansur al-Hadi
(he was the VP in Saleh’s reign of power) in a 2012 election. Yemen currently relies on foreign aid as its
number one source of income, and as 54% business freedom, 57.1% labor freedom, 68.5% monetary
freedom, 77.6% trade freedom, 50% investment freedom, and 30% financial freedom.
Regarding a sustainable Yemen

Yemeni’s live in a dark triangle of fear, suppression, and a mixed religious culture. The country
has serious divisions among religion / ideologies as well. The result is a fractured nation with no real guiding compass. Therefore, a sustainable future depends on a combination of three things.

One, foreign aid and investment, Two, an increased state investment in community based natural resource
management (CBNRM) as well as other forms of education, and three, the indoctrination of common
core values and investment in a common cultural identity… in other words, Yemeni’s must create a
sovereign government that promotes sustainability, an understanding of the environment that the
Yemeni’s live in, and they must create a common economy that promotes prosperity from within.
Foreign aid investment is crucial to the outcome of a prosperous Yemen. In this regard, foreign
investment from the global north in education, education related resources, and educational planning
aid (this is for all aspects of education from CBNRM to traditional education) must be provided, and
USED for the purpose of creating a sustainable Yemeni future. Further, establishing a fair and equal
government through a prosperous educational environment will increase the ability for Yemeni’s to
recognize a prosperous future through equality and common values combined with providing a common
identity and a sense of togetherness, which is key to creating a Yemeni sustainable future. But, more
than these things, establishing an understanding that breaking through cultural barriers via education
will eliminate hostility among the Yemeni people and reduce outside influence such as terrorist groups,
and it will establish a common ground from which future Yemeni people will prosper.

Regarding Politics and Government:

A sustainable government depends on the foundation with which it is built. An economy, a
government, a body, group, or an organization of people cannot sustain itself if it is not built on a
foundation of cooperation among people, a wiliness to work with each other, and an understanding that
every community, state, organization, etc. begins upon the foundation of self, that is you. As in, there is
an I in US and that is U. Through this series of understandings a solid foundation can be built. Through
these principles, one can clearly see that a sustainable future for Yemen goes straight through a path of
a rebuilt education system. And, this cannot be a system of education that works for the US and/ or the global north… It cannot be an education system that works for Saudi Arabia or other neighboring  states… It must be an educational system that works for Yemen. A system built on the foundation of
unification, a common interest that is written by the people, representing the people, and system that
can benefit the people… not select groups, thugs, the privileged, or corrupt government officials.

Regarding Education:

Emphasis on vocational education such as farming and agriculture is the key to creating a new
successful education system in Yemen. Teaching vocational education in Yemen with emphasis on the
cultivation and exportation of the countries brightest assets (figs, bananas, mangos, almonds, walnuts,
pears, pomegranates all work well in Yemen’s fertile soil, therefore vocational education in agriculture
would enable Yemeni’s sustainable economic growth) is essential for a Yemen’s prosperous and
sustainable future. Fishing is also a major industry for Yemen, therefore an investment in vocational
education with emphasis on fishing could provide long term economic sustainability.

Vocational education is often misunderstood as being solely blue collar, but, is becoming a
doctor not becoming a vocation? If it is then, can education in Yemen set the stage for the future of
education across the globe by simply creating a vocational education that actually works? Education is
solely vocationally driven any way – That is, everyone works in one form of another, the result is,
everyone should get paid to perform their favorite profession. Starting at an early age, rural peoples
should be out in the fields learning farming, etc. with the opportunity for each child to attend state run
professional/ vocational schools, and / or the opportunity to attend a state run university that would or
could lead to further education depending on the profession an individual chooses. Vocational
education or as I would prefer to call it, Professional Education (PE) will create a sustainable future for
all nations, may as well start with Yemen.

A Conclusion of Sorts:

Vocational education is the path for a successful Yemeni future. This education must emphasize
sustainability, prosperity, and unity. No system of government can change overnight, and it is through
education that Yemeni’s can change the social consciousness of their state. Education can lift the spirits
of a people, change the course of a nation, and create a state that is for all people, not just the elite.
Education includes teaching community based resource management, HIV/AID/STD education,
professional education, vocational education, government/ political education, as well as education
about all things in all ways. These things, among others not discussed here, through the eyes
of sustainability, will create a prosperous Yemen.

Monday, September 12, 2016

International Terrorism and Peace Process

IRAN: SANCTIONS, and PROLIFERATION

International Terrorism and Peace Process

Issue description:

“Nation-state efforts to develop or acquire Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), their delivery systems, or their underlying technologies constitute a major threat to the security of the United States, it’s deployed  troops, and allies. ” Currently, Iran is an aggressively  emerging threat to US National security  as it  tries  to defy sanctions and develop nuclear technology under the guise of the development of nuclear energy.

Critical Information:

“…The Joint Plan of Action (JPOA) has temporarily inhibited further progress in [Iran’s] uranium enrichment and plutonium capabilities and effectively eliminated Iran’s stockpile of 20 percent enriched uranium (Clapper).” However, Iran has plenty of motivation to continue developing ballistic missiles that are capable delivering WMD’s.

Analysis:

Despite US sanctions, Iran continues to be the largest nuclear proliferation threat because “Iran’s progress on space launch vehicles – along with its desire to deter the US and it’s allies – provides Tehran with the means and motivation to develop longer range missiles, including intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs)(Clapper).”

Conclusion:

Iran continues to defy US led sanctions, continues to build ballistic missiles, and is continuing to develop long range IBM which clearly threatens US interests in the Middle East, threatens US allies, threatens US National security,  and could potentially create instability  throughout the region which could draw the US into war with Iran.

Sources:

Worldwide Threat Assessment  of the US Intelligence  Community,  James R. Clapper

Critical issues regarding globalization

Issue Description:

Critical issues regarding globalization.

Critical aspects of globalization and its  implications to the International Community:

Globalization (the understanding that the world  is becoming economically intertwined on a global scale), is happening and it is an inevitable consequence of the fast paced interconnected world we currently live in. The critical macro issues surrounding globalization are political, economic and revolve around human rights, security, health/ environment and technology. On a micro level, these issues relate to population growth, food security, the development  and sustainability of natural  resources,  the spread of terrorism /ISIS/ISIL, the supersonic speed with which information and ideas can spread, and political alliances combined with nationalism.

What is being done to address impending globalization?
Currently the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA), the World Health Organization (WHO), and several other GO’S and NGO’s are working to provide a clear pathway to achieve economic sustainability through globalization.
What should be done to address globalization, and by whom?

There is no clear road to a sustainable  globalized  economy,  however,  globalization is inevitable. To find the root of these issues, we must first examine the positives, the negatives and the overall consequences  of globalization. 

To do this, I have created the following  pro vs. Con outline:

PROS
International Marketplace, better access to products and services from customers across the globe.
Augments manufacturing  on a global scale.
Stable cash flow that slowly lessens the difference of dollars
Slowly a global power is made, politics are unifying,  and advantageous risk can increase the flow of cash, and information throughout  the world.
Creates a universal  understanding  an fellowship  due to the intermingling  of culture  and shared common interests.

CONS
People in developed countries  are losing their jobs due to job outsourcing  to other nations.
A shift in wealth from a current leading nation economically may transfer superiority to other nations.
Potentially  leads to social degeneration  and communicable illness.
Risk of one business  ruling the whole world, potentially  leading to the loss of the cultural identity of a nation.

The result is clearly favorable  to globalization.  Globalization,  therefore has two ultimate conclusions. It can harm, and it can benefit the world. Nevertheless, globalization  is inevitable. Globalization  will change the collective consciousness,  it will change the way the world connects through technology,  through education,  through shared common values that spread from nation to nation, and through  the global understanding  that one world is a lot better than NONE.

Sources:
http://apecsec.org/globalization-pros-and-cons/

Weapons of Mass Destruction Proliferation Challenges to US National Security

Title:
Weapons of Mass Destructions (WMD) proliferation challenges to US national security.

Key elements of WMD Proliferation:
Definition of WMD`s: Chemical, Biological and Nuclear weapons. Chemical weapons have  chemical elements and can have explosive elements. Biological weapons contain a biological element combined with an explosive element, but can also be found in aerosol form. Nuclear can be used in explosive form and can be used as small, or dirty, bombs, and/or can be launched via missile.

Key elements of WMD non-proliferation:
Treaties, forms of politics, sanctions, inspections, and International Organizations (IO`s) such as the UN can be used to prevent the proliferation of WMD`s.

*Treaties, such as the Iran non-proliferation treaty (NPT), can be used to induce or relax sanctions, restrict or allow the enrichment of uranium for proposed power and public use, and to ensure that regular inspections can be made.

*Politics can be used to prevent WMD proliferation through meetings among leaders to stablish the foundations of agreement, the use of governmental decisions such as passing laws or agreeing on treaties or to enforce sanctions.

*Sanctions can be used to limit a state`s ability to prosper and flourish. In this regard, through politics, IO`s and through other means, sanctions can limit trade thereby making it even more difficult for a state to peruse WMD`s.

*Inspections performed through the UN via the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) can also be used to prevent WMD proliferation.

Primary US security concerns:
Countries that have nuclear weapons: US, France, Russia, Pakistan, Israel, United Kingdom, China, India and North Korea.

Reasons why countries have nuclear weapons:

*Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD)
*The potential for terrorists to gain control of WMD`s
*The impact of WMD`s on human beings and the environment.

Russia has them, China has them, north Korea has them, Pakistan has them, India has them which means the US must have them. And because China has them, India has them, because all of those countries have them, North Korea has them, and because of our relationship with Japan, Taiwan and South Korea, the US needs them to protect our assets and interests in the area.

International Organizations that proved key assistance in preventing WMD proliferation:

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), United Nations (UN), Governmental ( Congress, President, CIA, etc.).

Friday, September 9, 2016

North Korea and the recent nuclear test

North Korea set to use nuclear weapons at any time.

Issue Description:

"North Korea said [on Tuesday, September 22nd 2015] that it is Ready to use its nuclear weapons against the US at any time and that it's main nuclear facility was fully operational, allowing the country to improve both the quality and quantity of its nuclear weapons."  Although this statement followed preparations for the 70th anniversary of the Workers Party, Kim Jong Un seems to have his sights set on threatening the US due to what Un feels are unfair sanctions.  Further, on Thursday, September 8th,  2015, South Korean officials reported both a 5.3 earthquake in the area used by North Korea to test its nuclear weapons, and confirmed officially that North Korea had in fact successfully tested a nuclear weapon.

Critical Information:

This type of rhetoric and behavior is typical for the Kim regime, and experts believe that, "it's sending a message to the US that it's nuclear threat will only get worse if the country continues to be treated with sanctions and pressure rather than negotiations."  What makes this particular threat, and test unusual is that the 2015 threat was coupled with a pledge that North Korea will use missile technology that is banned by the UN Security Council.  Additionally,  North Korea's Atomic Energy Institute  issued a statement that the Kim regime has been improving, "the quality and quantity of its nuclear weapons," and has reopened Yongbyon nuclear facility.

Analysis:

Kim Jong Un,  and his regime have made it very  clear that economic sanctions and pressure from the Global Community  are not working, thusly proving that sanctions rarely work in cases where nuclear weapons are involved.  This is largely due to the fact that nuclear proliferation gives nations a large bargaining chip.  In fact, of the 18 nations that have been sanctioned for speaking out nuclear technology through 2007, only six have had successful outcomes.

Conclusion:

North Korea continues to be a nuclear threat to the United States.  This is mostly due to strength and power of a nuclear weapon.  Similar to a game of chess, the US must wary of Kim Jong Un's threats as well as continue to monitor North Korea's  nuclear activities. Further pressure must be applied, and although sanctions are having little effect, the must continue to be enforced.

Sources:

Bloomberg.com via foreignpolicy.com daily situation report 9/22/15
Bee, Ronald J. - Sanctions and Nonproliferation

Tuesday, September 6, 2016

Op-ed: foreign policy regarding Russia, Ukraine, and boots on the ground.

“Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges conceded to reporters Tuesday [March 17th, 2015] that arming Ukraine could help its fragile pro-Western government on the battlefield, at least in the short term. But he [also] said that it wouldn’t be enough to fundamentally ensure that Ukraine doesn’t lose any more territory to Russia in the wake of Moscow’s annexation of Crimea last year.” (Unknown, Web).

The aforementioned statement intrigues me as I have recently been giving a great deal of thought to the idea that the United States is headed straight into (knowingly or unknowingly) a humanity devastating, globally transitional, internationally recognized global war… that will ultimately lead to world unification, globalization of economic flows, and a total restructuring of civilization as we currently know it.  In other words, we’re headed for a social change toward unification resulting from overpopulation, war, lack of infrastructure, degrading infrastructure, and change in the collective consciousness of humankind that edges us closer to ,and eventually will become, a unified human race that ultimately pulls together to create a… New World Order.

Arming Ukraine citizens is edging us closer to world war (and eventual global unification) because, if America really is striving for peace among nations through the UN, foreign policy, etc., the United States has a responsibility to protect its allies.  At the same time, Russia is theoretically the US’ ally (through the P5+1, etc.) thusly putting American foreign policy in a sticky situation.  Officials must ask themselves, “Should we arm Ukraine and risk a global war to protect our allies?  Or, should we let Ukraine fend for itself and watch our other ally (Russia) destroy…” It seems to go on and on like this forever.  It’s easy to understand why even the highest echelon US officials are having trouble answering the armament question in Ukraine.  According to ForiegnPolicy.com, “‘Providing weapons is not a strategy,’ Hodges said. ‘There are great arguments for giving weapons to them to help raise the cost for the Russian’s.  I think that is a valid argument.  But saying that’s a valid argument is different from saying that this ought to be the policy.’” (Unknown, Web).

Officials are confused, American citizens are confused, Russia is very obviously confused, and Ukraine is caught in the middle of it.  And, foreign policy was still born out of this indecisiveness because in March, 2015, The US sent weapons and boots to Ukraine, even though - at the time - the media (including ForeignPolicy.com) reported that, “Hodges’s comments highlight the difficult policy choices facing the White House, where a growing number of senior military officials and civilian officials have publically said in recent weeks that the United States should arm Ukraine.” (Unknown, Web).

So what was the policy then?  Boots on the ground, arm the Ukraine citizens, and stay neutral.  But, how do we stay out of a war between friends?  “Here, take these guns Ukraine and , Russia, you already have weapons so, you’re on your own.”  Then what?  Should the US say, “OK.  We’re gonna drop these weapons in, but from the air – we’re not going in – but, we need to train these guys how to fight you with our weapons so, here… Don’t start fighting until AFTER we get out.  OK… Ready… Set… Go!”  Something like that? We should make a song – Get Neutral, kind of like, We are the World.  Everybody holding hands, sitting on the sidelines, order hot dogs and, who knows… Kebabs or falafel while we watch as, sort of, curious onlookers.  It would be nice… I can envision the pageantry… then… in a few months… New administration in. old administration heads out quietly and says, “we’re out of here, you’re on your own with that.”  I guess, that’s how it will go…  Pass the buck.

That said, if the buck keeps passing along, the world goes further into turmoil… Well…  THE BUCK WILL STOP AT MY DESK, and never leave (should I ever have the privilege of attaining such an amazing responsibility)… Until we finish what should be done now.   Here’s what I would do in this situation (were I President now, and not in 2020 as I am currently planning)… Hindsight- it’s my year.        ;-)

• One: Talk with both countries in a neutral place like – Bolivia.  I say Bolivia because we have a great deal of influence in that region, but it theoretically could be held anywhere outside of the EU, Russia, and the US. 

• Two.  Discuss the issues. Three, Review and Translate into foreign policy (FP) according to Smart, Moral and Legal (FP mainstay doctrine). 

• Three, defer to Congress, the United Nations, and relevant international organizations, revealing outcomes to said organizations PRIOR to consideration of further action.  If answers were needed immediately – as was the case on 9/11 – This process would need to be accomplished real time. 

• FOUR.  Ready the ships.  Prepare for large scale war.  Monitor Russia.  Study troop movements.  Plan for ground assaults.  Plan invasion tactics.  Be prepared for a military outcome. 

• FIVE.  Negotiate again.  Get back to the drawing board and put the negotiating brainiacs to work! 

• SIX.  Notify the press that the US is prepared to take action, but wants both sides to negotiate before it becomes involved.

• SEVEN. Review results, refer to SML, take action.

Essentially, the US foreign policy needs to be fluid enough to have real time action plans, long term action plans, and an action plan that sits somewhere in the middle.  These plans have to be working in conjunction with each other at all times.  In order for this functionality to occur, a system has to be established that can accomplish this task by using all forms of technology available known and yet undiscovered.  Obama’s administration has an uphill fight to accomplish this over the next year and a half.  For it is on his watch, that future foreign policy will be built, and a New World Oder will begin.  What that new world looks like, remains to be seen.  Russia, Ukraine, and the US’ reaction will undoubtedly play an integral part in humanity’s future outcome.

Works Cited
Unknown.
ForeignPolicy.com, http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/17/top-u-s-general-in-europe-arming-ukraine-isnt-a-strategy/ Web. 20015.

Monday, September 5, 2016

Critical issues regarding global energy as written for Prof. Keith Hansen, Sierra Nevada College (INTB 465)

Issue Description:
Critical issues regarding global energy.

Critical aspects of global energy use and their global implications:

The critical issues surrounding global energy consumption are vast and generally relate to fossil fuels, solar power, electric power, and wind power.  These issues vary in size, scale, by country, by demographics, by population, by a state’s foreign and domestic policies, and they cannot be fully measured.  The primary large/ macro issues relate to an increase in demand for fossil fuels, renewable/ alternative energy, environmental constraints, cost, and storage/ the cost/ the disposal of new energy sources such as batteries, etc. 

The primary detailed / micro issues relating to fossil fuel revolve around the durability of reserves and supply, pollution resulting from greenhouse gasses and climate change, the cost of extraction, the geopolitical dependability of supply, the unintended consequences of extraction (fracking, earthquakes, methane hydrate (natural gas)), and several other unknowable issues. 

The primary detailed/ micro issues relating to solar power include transportation (e.g. how does the international community move energy from the source to the consumer), currently there is only a 20% dependability of solar power, Dependence (US) is only at 20%, Investment/ tax credits, etc. depend on legislation, there are currently no efficient, affordable, transportable batteries or panels, solar energy requires a large landscape (land) for panels and storage, there is a great deal of concern over pollution resulting from improper storage, etc., and China is at the forefront of solar energy creation due to their supply of rare earth materials. 

The primary detailed/ micro issues relating to wind power relate to the need for vast quantities of land/ space, there are environmental concerns, the transportation of energy from the source to the consumer, the cost efficiency compared to that of oil, the dependability of wind power is only at 20%, the storage, transportation, and pollution resulting from batteries, and the fact that legislation is not dependable. 

The primary detailed/ micro issues revolving around nuclear power involve nuclear waste and safe disposal, terror risks (technical and human, natural disasters, cheating, political legislation, and the fact that costs to maintain and dispose of nuclear power are going up.

What is being done by the international community to address the issues surrounding global energy use?

Currently, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC), the Association of South East Asian Nations (ASEAN), and the International Partnership for Energy Efficiency Cooperation (IPEEC) are leading the way in solving the global energy crisis.  In addition to the aforementioned, the United Nations (UN) is forging a pathway to energy sustainability through its forum and through global treaties and initiatives.

In addition, the following can be accomplished to further enhance global cooperation, and continued energy sustainability efforts:

A global commitment from all nations to eliminate fossil fuels, and promote alternative new, and renewable sources of energy must be imagined and created.  The initiative should be written and agreed upon by all nations throughout the globe.  This initiative should not only strongly encourage the positive, realistic, and achievable goal to reinvent the way, the process, the distribution of, and the storage of renewable/ sustainable energies, it should also be international law. Further, all nations must abide by this law in order to ensure that the future of humankind can reach endless longevity.

Sources:
In class Notes
Global Issues, Jackson, Robert M. pp. 127-135

Saturday, September 3, 2016

Critical aspects of WMD

Critical Aspects of Weapons of Mass Destruction and challenges to the global community:

Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD’s, AKA Chemical, biological, and nuclear weapons) proliferation has been humankind’s greatest struggle since their creation.  Chemical weapons have a devastating effect on human beings, the environment, and contain chemical elements combined with explosive elements, while biological weapons contain a biological element combined with an explosive element, but can also be found in aerosol form, and nuclear weapons can be used as small or “dirty” bombs, bombs, and/ or can be launched via missile.  Countries that currently possess nuclear weapons are: The United States, Russia, France, Pakistan, Israel, the United Kingdom, China, India, and North Korea.  Some of the primary global concerns about the proliferation of WMD’s are: Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD), the potential for terrorists to gain control of WMD’s, and the impact of WMD’s on human beings and the environment.  Additionally, the fact that Russia has them, China has them, Pakistan has them, North Korea has them, India has them, and because the aforementioned countries have them, the United States has them, is leading the International Community into a proliferation cycle that is never ending.  Ultimately, countries that possess WMD’s have them for both security, and as a deterrent.  Further, a growing global fear of WMD’s falling into the hands of ISIS/ISIL and other terrorist organizations is preeminent among leading global nations, GO’s, and NGO’s.
International concerns and tools used to prevent WMD proliferation:

Several treaties including the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) of 1970, the START treaty, the SORT treaty, the SALT I/II treaties, and the New Start treaty have been created and implemented to induce or relax sanctions, restrict or allow the enrichment of uranium for proposed power/ public use, and to ensure that regular inspections can be made.  Diplomacy and politics are being used to prevent WMD proliferation through meetings among leaders to establish the foundations of agreement, the use of governmental decisions such as passing laws, or agreeing on treaties and to enforce sanctions.  Additionally, sanctions are being used to limit a nation state’s ability to prosper and flourish through the proliferation of WMD’s.  Further, the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) can perform inspections through the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and can be used to prevent further WMD proliferation.
Additional steps that the International Community can use to prevent further WMD proliferation:

The International Community can and should create a new global initiative that demands and encourages positively - through diplomacy, politics, and the use of all means available - the destruction of WMD arsenals.  This initiative should take into account peaceful uses of nuclear power, the harmful nature of WMD’s to humanity and the environment, and the growing need for a more globally unified world that incites peace, rather than a call to arms.  Further, the global initiative should have international recognition as the governing order regarding WMD proliferation and create standards and policies that can be realistically achieved.  Additionally, this global initiative should require all nations to undergo frequent inspections, require accurate weapon counts to ensure the viability of a no cheating policy, and should require global compliance through effective policies, practices, measures, and treaties.

References:
In class notes
Global Issues (Payne) pp. 121-135
Great Decisions #3/205, What ISIS Really Wants
Global Issues, The Putin Doctrine
US National Security, Sarkesian, Williams and Cimbala, pp. 81&85
Global Issues #6/2011, Sanctions and Nonproliferation
Why is Israel’s Nuclear Arsenal Not Mentioned in the Iran Deal Debate? Landay, Johnathan S.

Friday, September 2, 2016

Critical issues relating to China and global security as written for Prof. Keith Hansen, Sierra Nevada College 2015

Issue Description:

Critical issues relating to China and global security.

China’s long proud history began long before democracy (as the US defines it) existed.  Reaching back as far as the first century, China has a long and proud history of dictatorship that evolved through a revolution in 1949 which led to the installation of a communist government, and a, “…Complex mix of intensifying [international] diplomacy, growing international rivalry, and increasingly intertwined [international] economies.”  Communism, cyber terrorism, a global dependence upon rare Earth material, an international dependence on Chinese exports, economic instability, and fear of nuclear proliferation are among the top global concerns regarding China.

Additionally, China suffers from overpopulation, China does not share democratic values/ ideologies, maintains a nuclear arsenal, and relies on the following three structural components to form its foreign policy: One; Sovereignty, to maintain cultural and political stability.  Two; to keep China’s large population in check.  Three; development, to feed and secure the Chinese people.  Further, China wants to be seen as a super power, has a history of sensitivity to domestic disorders caused by foreign threats, and has an aging population that is composed of a diverse group that includes Chinese Nationalists, as well as different religious and ethnic groups.

Further, China has a need for Iran’s oil which has resulted in China’s need to protect Iran thusly complicating negations and nuclear non-proliferation efforts being made by the United Nations (UN) with Iran.  India is the largest democratic nation in Asia which has led to several conflicting interests between the two nations.  Taiwan, composed of primarily separatist Nationalists, is still considered by China to be within Chinese territory, however, the Taiwanese do not consider themselves to be part of China which complicates relations between China and several democratic nations including the United States.  To further complicate matters, China is currently building a string of islands in what has been traditionally considered international waters (the South China Sea).

International tools being used to address China’s global objectives:
The United Nations (UN), and the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) are currently being utilized as a forum to maintain international peace, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and treaties like the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) are being used to monitor global nuclear weapon/ energy activities, and organizations such as the World Health Organization (WHO) are working to direct and coordinate international health within the UN system.

Additional steps the International Community can take to deal with China:

Working with China diplomatically through negotiations, treaties, and NGO’s combined with a common vision that promotes global peace is the best path to incorporating China’s ideology into the International Community.  Using the IAEA to rid the world of nuclear weapons further promotes the interests of global nuclear nonproliferation and prevents China from cheating, reduces and prevents the reckless sale or theft of nuclear materials, and promotes a healthier more peaceful international community.  Finally, incorporating rather than ex-communicating China’s economic interests into a global strategy for International economic sustainability will further encourage a more peaceful International community.

Sources:
Council on foreign Relations; http://www.cfr.org/china/us-relations-china-1949---present/p17698
In Class Notes
Strohecker, Lena; INTL 420 review
Worldwide threat Assessment of US Intelligence Committee, Senate Armed Services Committee (2015); Clapper, James R.
LeRoy, MeiLi; INTB 465 review
Global Issues #5.1 China’s Search
Global Issues #3.4 China’s Bad Earth
Global Issues (Payne) pp. 38-39

Wednesday, August 31, 2016

Critical issues relating to Russia and global security

Critical Aspects of Russia and it's Global Implications:

Russia has a continuing and ongoing relationship with China, Cuba, and other communist nations that began with friendly relations due to the cold war.  The end of the cold war brought about several changes to Russian foreign policy that clearly express  a lingering ideology (that has been recently been verbalized by Russian President Vladimir Putin and has been labeled the Putin Doctrine) in which the following main point has been expressed:  It is the desire of Russia, the people of Russia, and President Putin, to rebuild Russia as a major global power, to increase its global influence, and to protect its citizens abroad.  This hegemony is being expressed currently through the use  of power I  Syria  (an effort to destroy the Islamic State (ISIS / ISIL )), across the globe through its nuclear threat/ deterrent power, and through the use of clandestine services / intelligence gathering tools. Although the US and Russia have committed to reducing nuclear arsenals from 10,000 warheads (1980's) to 1,500 in 2010 and hope to decrease numbers even further (through START, SORT, and New START), nuclear proliferation is still a primary concern throughout the globe.   Further, after the 2015 bombings in Paris, and the downing of a Russian warplane, Russia's primary objective has changed itself into the complete destruction of ISIS/ISIL. This fact is pushing countries who don't usually get along (US, China, Iran, India, Saudi Arabia,  etc.) to work together to defeat ISIS/IS IL using collaboration,  shared resources, and other essential tools to eliminate the threat of ISIS/IS IL across the  globe.

International tools being used to address Russia, and Russian global objectives:

To address the aforementioned issues, the international community has formed a variety of tools that help keep our world safe and peaceful. To combat nuclear proliferation issues, the international community has established the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) which is designed to regulate and inspect atomic energy in all forms (peaceful,  power, and weapon grade). Additionally,  the United Nations (UN), the United Nations Security Council  (UNSC), and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) are effective forums for the discussion of treaties such as SORT, START, and New START.  The UNSC  is also a perfect forum for collaboration with other nations, and to create a unified force that is designed to combat ISIS/ISIL.

Additional steps the International community can take to deal with Russia:

Russia is a complex issue that crosses boundaries that have not yet been approached in history.  While the international community and Russia Agee that ISIS/ISIL must be destroyed, the methods in which the community comes together to rid the planet of ISIS/ISIL is contentious to say the least. Further, Russia's nuclear arsenal is cause for concern due to potential theft, sale, or other forms of proliferation of and/ or the frightening potential for nuclear materials to fall into the hands of terrorists. Therefore, it is the recommendation of this humble reporter that the international community should continue to reach for diplomatic solutions through the use of the United Nations, specifically the UNSC, to continue maintaining efforts in nuclear non proliferation teaties, and continue to work with any and all available resources to eliminate ISIS/ISIL, and to promote world peace, as well as to strive for a safer global community. Further, it is my belief that through a global coalition of cooperating nation states, that agreement can be achieved to create a global community against terror. Working with Russia, not against it, is the best option of or a safe, sustainable future.

SOURCES:

In class notes, Prf. Keith Hansen ; Sierra Nevada College
Russia and the Near and Abroa, Shevel Oxana
US National Security, Sarkesion pp. 81 & 85
The Putin Doctrine, Jackson

Friday, August 26, 2016

Land Redistribution as written for Prof. Mary Lewellen, Sierra Nevada College



Land Redistribution: 
Not a Black and White Issue



By: J. Dean Grimes
Created for Sierra Nevada College: INTL415, Summer 2015



CONTENTS:



1. History of Land Redistribution
2. Not a Black and White Issue
3. Problems
4. Suggested solutions
5. Conclusion
6. References

The History of Land Redistribution

Land redistribution “officially began in 1980 with the signing of the Lancaster House Agreement, an effort to more equitably distribute land between black subsistence farmers and white Zimbabweans of European ancestry, who had traditionally enjoyed superior political and economic status(Wikipedia, 1).” In 2008, Robert Mugabe, President of Zimbabwe, lost a crucial vote in Parliament that would have granted him lifetime power, and, in an effort to regain strength within Parliament and among the people, Mugabe began to utilize land redistribution as a means to regain support from his constituents. This action resulted in the violent reclamation of property (particularly farmland), and the redistribution of wealth among black Zimbabweans.  In principle, the idea of land redistribution seems fair and just, but, there are several unintended adverse issues resulting from this concept, idea, and law.  For example, the white farmers in Zimbabwe employed hundreds of workers.  These farmers knew how to farm exceptionally well whereas the new land owners have little to no knowledge in this field, and the violent reclamation of these farms has become a form of reverse racism that has left hundreds of white third generation farmers homeless and without a country.  “I am a Zimbabwean.  I was born here, I bought this farm, I paid off the loan, and now the government wants to come in and take it (Mugabe and the White African).”  The aforementioned statement clearly sums up the issues at stake and at hand.  One cannot simply “take” land that was purchased legally, managed exceptionally well, and provided homes and income for thousands of workers without consequence.  Throughout this paper, I will identify and dissect the issues, provide potential solutions to the issues, and discuss the political ramifications for the United States should they chose to become involved in the process of recovery.

There is, however, the other side of the argument which stems from the 1890’s and the British South Africa Company (BSAC) takeover, in which, “Over 3000 white soldiers who assisted in the BSAC takeover of the country were given land grants of 1,200 hectares (3,000 acres) or more, and black people living on the land became tenants. Later, Land Apportionment and Tenure Acts reserved extensive low-rainfall areas for black-only tribal-trust lands and high rainfall areas for white ownership, which gave rise to cases of black people being excluded from their own land. White settlers were attracted to Rhodesia by the availability of tracts of prime farmland that could be purchased from the state at low cost (Wikipedia 3).”  Which then begs the question, “Who stole land from whom, and is land something you can really purchase anyway?  To answer these questions, we need to dive a little deeper into the history of Robert Mugabe, and the motivation for land reclamation/ redistribution, his motives for using this to remove third generation Zimbabweans from land that they worked hard to cultivate, and what’s happening to these newly displaced people, as well as the economic impact land redistribution has made.

Robert Mugabe came into power as the current President of Zimbabwe on December 22, 1987, and “rose to prominence in the 1960s as the leader of the Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU) during the conflict against the conservative white-minority government of Rhodesia. Mugabe was a political prisoner in Rhodesia for more than 10 years between 1964 and 1974. Upon release Mugabe, along with Edgar Tekere, immediately left Rhodesia with the assistance of Rekayi Tangwena in 1975 to kick-start the fight during the Rhodesian Bush War from bases in Mozambique. At the end of the war in 1979, Mugabe emerged as a hero in the minds of many Africans. He won the general elections of 1980 after calling for reconciliation between the former belligerents, including white Zimbabweans and rival political parties, and thereby became Prime Minister on Zimbabwe's independence in April 1980.

Soon after independence Mugabe set about creating a ZANU–PF-run one-party state, establishing a North Korean-trained security force, the Fifth Brigade, in August 1981 to deal with internal dissidents.[2] Mugabe attacked former allies ZAPU in which the Fifth Brigade crushed an armed rebellion by fighters loyal to his rival Joshua Nkomo, leader of the minority Ndebele tribe, in the province of Matabeleland. Between 1982 and 1985 at least 20,000 people died in ethnic cleansing and were buried in mass graves.[3][4] Mugabe consolidated his power in December 1987, when he was declared executive president by parliament, combining the roles of head of state, head of government, and commander-in-chief of the armed forces, with powers to dissolve parliament and declare martial law.

In 2008 Mugabe suffered a narrow defeat in the first round of a presidential election but he subsequently won the run-off election in a landslide after his opponent Morgan Tsvangirai withdrew; Mugabe then entered a power-sharing deal with Tsvangirai as well as Arthur Mutambara of the MDC-T and MDC-M opposition party. In 2013, the Election Commission said Mugabe won his seventh term as President, defeating Tsvangirai with 61 percent of the vote in a disputed election in which there were numerous accounts of electoral fraud.[5][6] Mugabe was elected as the Chairperson of the African Union (AU) on 30 January 2015.[7] He had previously led the AU's predecessor, the Organization of African Unity in 1997–98 (Wikipedia 2).”

During the 2008 elections, Mugabe determined that the best way to regain control of Parliament and the popular vote was to place a heavy emphasis on land redistribution and his Zimbabwe African National Union (ZANU) roots combined with his historic leadership as a rebel against white minority rule.  Seizing an opportunity to regain power and influence, Mugabe began reclaiming land owned by white farmers through their forced and violent removal.  Since 2008 hundreds of farmers have lost their land, thousands of workers have been displaced, the country has lost billions of dollars in exports as a result, and what used to be Africa’s great bread basket is now a wasteland with dilapidated infrastructure and farms that have nothing growing on them but weeds.

Not a Black and White Issue
  Aside from the fact that land redistribution is an overwhelmingly complex issue and it is not, forgive the pun, as black and white or as clear as it could be, the issue really comes down to land ownership. To solve this issue, this author has determined that land belongs to the people that live there.  History has little or nothing to do with anything in this day and age, in this century, in this new millennia, in this time.  Rather, land ownership in today’s world comes down to you, me, us, I, and them.  Meaning, can I get along with you, can we get along with them, can they get along with us, and can we all work together to accomplish one goal?  And what purpose does fighting over land provide?  I liken it to this:  My grandfather fought very hard, suffered many great losses, endured many hardships, and suffered at length as a farmer until he was around 45 years old, and he sold his first batch of wine grapes to a guy named Robert Mondavi in 1975.  His efforts have since transferred to me, and now I am in control of the land that he worked hard to pass on to myself and other members of my family.  Does the government have a right to take this land back?  Yes.  Will they?  Who knows, but if they attempted this, what grounds would they have to remove me from it? 

As a grape grower, I am contributing to society in several ways:  One, I pay taxes based on my revenues thereby contributing to the economy.  Two, I purchase equipment and supplies from local and national vendors, and three, I employ thousands of workers and I provide homes for migrant workers and others who are in need.  Is this not a great contribution to society?  Does what I do not affect the rest of the nation, our economy, and benefit the exportation of California wine to other nations thereby boosting US export power?  If the answer to these questions is yes, then it seems, that land redistribution may become quite a problem should they remove me from my land and replace me with someone who has no knowledge of grape growing, no understanding of the economics of the industry, or has no understanding of how to employ people, contribute to local, statewide, and national prosperity. 

Why?  Because my forced removal leaves a deficit throughout the community.  When there is a deficit in community, a void and a vacuum forms wherein anything can happen.  Anger, resentment, fear, and distrust would be an additional result of these actions.  And, this pathway leads to a darkness that Zimbabwe and other nations/ states who try to employ this method of reclamation are just beginning to feel.

The reality is that no one can really own land in the first place.  Land was originally free.  It was a gift that came with life just as food, air, and water once were.  But, somewhere in history land became something you could purchase, and the resulting land ownership laws, rules, clauses, and debates/ wars about who owns what have ensued.  But, there is no real right and wrong here, because ultimately, land belongs to everyone as much as air and water.

Solutions
Solution 1:  Forcibly remove Mugabe and others who seek to forcibly remove legal land owners.  But then, who has the power to do this?  The African Union (AU)?  The United Nations (UN)?  The International Criminal Court (ICC)? The United States?  A coalition of nations?  Invasion of the country to re-establish true democratic law rather than democratic socialism?  Ultimately, there is no clear cut answer to this question as none of the aforementioned have the actual power to remove Mugabe and others like him.  However, perhaps there is a loophole that I am unaware of.  Perhaps Mugabe could be tried for crimes against humanity in the ICC, perhaps the US could selectively eliminate Mugabe.  Yet, Mugabe is a hero to many.  Would this not cause further resentment?  Hatred even?  Ultimately, this solution cannot be worked out without the thoughts and contribution of many great minds.

Solution 2: Honor and reimbursement.  This solution suggests that land selected for redistribution be purchased at fair market value by the Zimbabwe government, and then be distributed to selected Zimbabweans, who, for a period of time, would learn how to farm the land by the farmers who are leaving the land during a period of transition.  This transition period would enable old land owners to humanely leave their farms while ensuring little to no economic loss, little to no loss of employment, and little to no overall societal impact.  Honoring land agreements proves truth can prevail.  The truth in Zimbabwe’s case is that land was taken from Africans, distributed to the British, and now, the African’s want what was originally rightfully theirs.  However, this is the modern world, not the 1800’s, and the question remains, “Is a 3rd generation farmer who bought his or her own land legally, responsible for what someone did one hundred years ago?”  There is no answer to this question, therefore this solution is moot, and becomes void upon the onset.

Solution 3:  Start over.  Perhaps, and this is just an idea, but, perhaps the real solution is this: Give new unowned land in Zimbabwe to those who are in need.  Perhaps Mugabe could start building homes instead of taking them.  Perhaps the government can train new farmers by investing in education.  Perhaps allowing legal land owners to maintain their land might encourage growth in the Zimbabwe economy.  Perhaps focusing on growth rather than destruction would serve this country, and others like it, exceptionally well.  Perhaps focusing on building up rather than taking down might be a worthwhile investment.  Perhaps Mugabe wouldn’t have to worry about losing his power if he could peacefully transition it to someone who has the interests of all Zimbabweans at heart.  Perhaps Mugabe could encourage people to change the social consciousness, and move toward a social mindset that encourages the equality of all people, and focus less, if at all, on separatism, racism, and social classism. Perhaps Mugabe could move toward an us instead of a them.  Perhaps Mugabe could set a precedent of equality and concentrate on the ideals of Ubuntu, the connectedness of humankind, and perhaps he could become a leader that sets the example of unity and equality that other nation states would follow.  Perhaps, Mugabe could accept the world as it is instead of focusing on the problems and social injustices of the past, and never forget, rather embrace the history of his country and create a new policy of tolerance, love, peace, and preach the connectedness of humanity to his people.  And, perhaps Mugabe could teach leaders of other nation states to do the same.

Conclusion
Land redistribution is a real problem.  Its overarching effects reach into the pockets of thousands who no longer have jobs, destroys the economic prosperity of nations that enforce it, and provides no real solutions for the greater issue at hand which is how to unify a nation state’s people.  Legal solutions cannot have a great effect on the equal distribution of land because, in reality, the person legally living on the land is the true and rightful owner.  Honoring land ownership, but continuing to redistribute land through the legal repurchasing of land may be an answer, but it is a temporary solution at best because it merely covers a wound that is deeply engrained in the social consciousness of the state’s people which is essentially the problem of racism and classism.  The real solution to land redistribution is solving racism, classism, and changing the social consciousness which basically entails the promotion of tolerance and the understanding that we are all one unified people under one unified nation/ state.  Eliminating the idea that there are differences among us is the key.  Regrouping, pressing the re-start button, investing in infrastructure, building new homes and putting people to work by building them, training new farmers, giving unused land to people that are homeless, providing resources for people to get healthy when they are sick, giving back to the community that gives to you, and beginning a new chapter in your nations history is the best way to solve this problem.  There are no easy answers, but there is a way.  It is a march toward forgiveness, toward acceptance, toward loving each other, toward understanding each other, toward growing with and for each other.  The solution therefore is not us versus them, or me versus you, but conveying a message of equality that is so powerful, that it changes the social consciousness of a nation, and the nations that follow your example.

References
Movie 1:  https://www.netflix.com/title/70119673
Wikipedia 1:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_reform_in_Zimbabwe
Wikipedia 2:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Mugabe
Wikipedia 3:  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_people_in_Zimbabwe

Tao for King as written for Prof. Robert King, Sierra Nevada College

"Truth is what stands the test of experience." - Einstein

At first glance… Everything appears to be real.  But is it?  For example – What if the color that I see as “red” is actually “blue” to you?  When you look in the mirror, do you ask yourself, “Why am I ‘me’?”  Have you ever wondered why you were well off, or could seem to get everything you need, but looked at a friend and see that they can’t quite achieve their goals, dreams or aspirations?  Why is it so much harder for a person to come from nothing and achieve greatness?  Why is “why” even a question?  What makes us more intelligent than other life forms on this planet?  Why do we seem to seek out conquest, war, and look to overthrow?  Why do we impale ourselves with the harsh life-shattering stick of the world as we know it?  Why are “we” (humankind) continuing down a path toward inevitable destruction? Is it because “we” seek to destroy?  Is it because we can think of nothing else to do with our time?  Is it because we cannot control some innate presupposed condition that lingers deep within the heat of our  souls that is telling us that one of us is far superior than another?  Where do thoughts come from?  How can we change them?  Do we even want to?  Is the world really falling apart at the seams?  Are we headed for inevitable extinction, and self-annihilation?  What if… There was no “what if?” These are the questions I will attempt to answer throughout this article, along with the possible solutions to each dilemma.  Take the journey with me – put on your thinking cap, get stoned, go drink a beer, drink ten… I don’t care what you have to do to join me on this quest, but get to it and get back to me… this is going to be Eppic (as in to big for one “P”).

The beginning: We are HUNTER GATHERER’S
What is real?  A white male was killed by a black police officer today… Did you see the news about it?  Um… Probably not.  Why?  It wasn’t there.  But… It happened.  And so we can see that what is real is simply what is real to the person who witnesses it.  Life is, therefore, in some ways fictional.  What you see, what you perceive to be real, may in fact be the very opposite of what someone else may see.  Consider, then, that nothing is real, that even our perception of what we know to be real, may in fact not be.  Black may be light, light may be dark.  Real may be unreal.  True, may be untrue.  Truth may not exist at all.  So, in order to find some sort of history to what “is,” or what/ who “I am,” we have to go back in time.  Back to hunters, back to gatherers, and the decision of humankind to stay in one place.  Let’s understand at least the sociology/ some of the anthropology of this, let’s discover some of the pathways that led us to where we are now.

Human kind has an innate ability to survive.  It is this deep instinct for survival that makes us both human, and animal… A mammal.  You think of a whale and say, “We are not whales!”  But we are… essentially, just animals roaming a planet foraging and planning our next amazing food conquest.  Here’s how it started.
Humankind (Mankind, Western Industrialized humans, mammals of the human species) had simple roots that are deeply ingrained in our psyche, and… when humankind decided to stop traveling, start gathering, start saving… Society as we know it today was born.  From a frugal beginning, man suddenly had to create order out of a slightly chaotic society.  Who then created this?  Let us pre-suppose, for the purposes of this article, that society was born out of the concept of gathering and saving, therefore, the Gatherer’s somehow obtained control.  Whether this was through intelligence, societal rankings, or however, we must have a few presuppositions and this is one of them.  So, if the Gatherer’s eventually maintained control by whatever means they had, we can then assume that hunters became warriors, warriors became slaves out of malice, punishment, or for whatever reason the gathering command had in mind, and that everyone who wasn’t a hunter, gatherer – eventually a soldier – also became slaves.  And, if the purpose of slavery was to create, build, etc. then slavery was in fact useful.  Additionally, Gatherer’s had to take charge because grain storage, distribution of said grain, etc. had to be semi-government controlled.  If then the gatherers took control of storage out of sheer necessity, then, one can fairly assume that Gatherer’s eventually created the civilization that we now know.  We also can safely assume that armies were born out of necessity for control of said harvests and storage, and that being in the military, was – and perhaps still is – a higher form of slavery… That is, “Do what you’re told, don’t ask questions.”  Or as President Bill Clinton put it in 1991 – “Don’t ask… Don’t Tell.”  Therefore,  if we can make these safe assumptions for the purpose of this article, then we can safely move on toward guns… germs, and steel.

In order for humankind to “protect” its food, the storage of said food (always think Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dream Coat), and increasing interests that eventually would be termed, “National Interests” and “Foreign Policy,” humankind developed weapons.  Weapons were created from steel.  Steel was created from technology derived from planting and tending to the needs of crops, that were stored, which eventually needed to be protected, which created the need for the domestication of farm animals such as cows, sheep, etc., which led to the eventual domestication of animal diseases, which led to the eventual immune system adaptation and eventual evolution, which enabled mankind to survive plagues and develop medicine to fight said plagues, create science, explore the world, and eventually led to the current civilization that is humankind as we know it today.   Eventually, Humankind began to seek, develop, destroy, refabricate, reinvent, and create more territory, develop better metals, which led to stronger, more powerful, weapons, better technology to enhance said weapons, and the eventual emerging/ creation of current politics, diplomacy, national security  strategies, foreign policy, the combination of science, technology, religion, ethics, economics, and politics as we now understand them, and in a way, realize the supposed truth of the necessity for humankind to posses knowledge and use of the aforementioned.

ECONOMICS – CAPITALISM
So how did capitalism come into being if humans were only trying to protect food sources and expand their territory for hunting and gathering?  There are many theories that hypothesize about the innumerable possibilities of this equation, that is, the evolution of human prosperity and the globally / culturally accepted understanding of economics, however, for the purposes of this article, let us pre-suppose the following: 
Capitalism came into being because of human growth, expansion, and knowledge that, led the ruling authorities toward the revolutionary understanding that, without it (capitalism), those in power could not keep their power or pass it on to their kin.

Current Capitalism, to me, does not make sense.  The ever-expanding outputs outweigh the potential and the actual inputs.  Therefore, as Spock would say, “It is illogical Captain.”  To put it another way, Capitalism leaves humankind in constant deficit.  This deficit affects humankind in multiple ways –ways in which we are currently experiencing severe hardship as a derivative – I.e., waste, constantly ever-expanding unsustainable infrastructure, war, peace… unity (lack of).  These issues result from Capitalism and cannot be adjusted, recalculated, or fixed in any way shape or form.  Modern Math, in fact, dictates this equation and the frightening result.  Therefore, what Humankind perceives to be real, “Capitalism” is in fact an illusion – for the purposes of this article given the numerous presuppositions I have repeatedly offered.  (These suppositions, of course, are logically driven and proven as fact by many notable authorities on the subject, and they have been disproven in the same right, by similarly notable professionals).  Regardless, I neither care whether you agree with these presuppositions or not, just that you accept them as what they are:  Presuppositions… They are ideas at best. They have been proven and disproven by many.  Nonetheless, let us continue with this train of thought for a moment and consider government.

GOVERNEMENT:
Gatherer’s were the keepers of information.  Therefore, again, for the purposes of this article, Gatherer’s were the founders of government as we know it.  Often I am asked, “what is the most important election I should vote in?”  And the answer I ALWAYS provide is:  “He or she who controls water and power controls your destiny… Always vote in your local election.”  And here’s why I say that… GRAIN STORANGE and GATHERER’S.
Those evil bastards… Just Kidding… But, “If his grain can get stolen, MY grain can get stolen!!!!”  Hence law, hence government, hence kingship, hence democracy.

You see,  while all you hunters were out building tools to kill animals, creating steel that helped us Gatherer’s create weapons and plow our fields, we had millennia of understanding about crops… you had years of understanding hunting and warfare.  So… we gatherer’s took control.  While you slowly became our slaves, we slowly became your masters.  And… we dominated you, we used you to tame the  land, we forced you create guns, we forced you to adapt to (and manifest) germs, we destroyed and land that we eventually claimed for ourselves, and now… it’s better that you accept the lie, accept what WE tell you is truth, enjoy your false prosperity with your credit cards and futile lies of wealth… WE are in control… WE are the TRUTH.  WE are the “Truth that stands the test of experience.” (Einstein)

Or do you feel like accepting that truth?
I Don’t.
I accept the facts of it… but not that it is the truth of it.  So… For the purposes of this article, let us hereafter presuppose that I disagree with the aforementioned and feel that Capitalism is an amazing concept, government is a great thing, and that I believe our current world can have a positive outcome for humankind should we work from within to create an alternative.

THE ALTERNATIVE:
There is no ONE alternative.
THE ALTERNATIVES:
There are several alternatives, but for the purposes of this article we shall name three and dissect each possibility.  Option ONE,  let’s start completely over.  Option TWO, let’s work within the system to change the outcome of our current behavior.  Option THREE, Let’s continue on our current path and hope there is a positive outcome.

OPTION 1: Starting over:
Imagine, if you will, that the lights went out right now.  That you had 20 maybe thirty minutes of battery power on your extremely smart phone that controls the very moment you are in right now because you just…  Got a text.  Regardless, you forget about the text, or the fact that you have no battery power on your phone because the lights are out in your classroom.  30 students look at you, you look at them.  They look at each other.  There is a flash.  It is the electromagnetic pulse that is the remnant from a Chinese nuclear arsenal that has now hit Pearl Harbor, Alaska, Seattle, Portland, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego.  Everything gets quiet.  You do not know what has happened?  You know nothing of the attack nor will you for several months as you discover that it will take months to find other survivors…  There is a thunderous clap.  Flash of light.  Poof of dusty smoke, and moments later, you find yourself one of only a few survivors from an all-out – Mutually Assured Destruction.  What do you do now?  You’re a natural leader, and thirty people in your room may have survived?  What is your next step?  The world begins anew…
Thoughts?  _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Give up?  Here’s what I would do…
One, determine who had injuries and who did not.  Divide the dead from the survivors… and establish a preliminary morgue so as not to be preoccupied with the dead / injured, nor to be preoccupied with their safety.  Two; divide into two groups people who had technology, information, news updates, etc. and the people who knew where things were, like food, clothing, etc.  Anyone remaining who had none of these things, I would divide into groups who could assist the aforementioned.

If one were to analyze my actions to this point, the analyzer can very quickly see that what I actually have done was: I just became the ruler.  I have already separated people into groups.  Groups composed of the helpless, people who can find things (hunters), people who can collect and maintain information (gatherer’s), and the unfortunates who have nothing to offer but help those who can hunt or gather… (slaves). Nevertheless, consciously, or subconsciously based on all of the aforementioned presuppositions, there is a VERY high likelihood that in that moment, should it have existed, that all thirty surviving students would have followed me without question.  But then, would we be starting anew?  Starting over?  Or would history, science, etc., dictate that human beings are predestined to revisit the same truths of our current world as a result of following my actions on this theoretical day, in say 2000 years?
BUT… What if we stated OVER completely.  That is, you, me, I, we, Us, Everyone… Did not survive this devastating event? What if the human species was reborn, the world was created anew, and there were hopeful signs for a new human future…

BORN FROM THE BEGINNING…  A FRESH START:
As animals, we would still have instinct I suppose.  This new breed of human beings might still have the same human capabilities, heck… we would be human.  So, obviously we would be hunting, gathering etc.  Let’s start there.  HUNTER GATHERER.

THE CITY STATE must be Reimagined from the Beginning:
The first thing Humanity would have to understand is the connectivity and relationship that man, plants, animals, and all living things share.  Humans would need to be intelligent enough to realize the symbiotic nature humankind has with all living things.  That we are all connected through a collective consciousness that exists for the benefit of Humankind’s salvation.

Imagine a scenario such as this:
You ride on a horse to your neighbor’s house… this may not be a horse, it may be a llama or something that has multiple uses such as food, transportation and water… perhaps a camel… but for now, assume a horse:  You need camel hide for some reason and perhaps a bit of milk… Does your neighbor give it to you?  And if he/ she does, what will you give him in return?  And if you have nothing to offer in return, will he give it to you anyway?   Let us assume that, based on all previous suppositions, he does.  And you return home with milk, a cow hide, and some meet for dinner.  Further, I’d like to pre-suppose from this point forward that this is the case for all transactions of similar nature throughout the duration of at least this section – though I would have it considered for all sections.  Let us also presuppose that – from this moment through the duration of this section that this is the common practice.  That I need something you have and you provide it out of respect for myself – being your neighbor – and should you need something, I will do the same.  Is this BARTERING?

PROOF:  The resulting system would then be based on Earth, common respect for the land and the resource(s) it (He/ She/ Mother) provides, and a system may be developed based on the concept that Humankind is connected to Each other (Interconnectivity), the Earth, and the Universe, therefore God. 

HOWEVER:
The world is as She is.  And She is in a state of serious downward spiral.  Nevertheless, there is hope.  Given the said conditions in previous aspects of this article, it can be truly said that “Truth is in the eye of the beholder” (Unknown.)   It can also be said that, “Truth stands with the test of experience.” (Einstein.)
Therefore, if the world were to awaken, to accept a new collective consciousness, and accept the follies of previous generations to be true, accepting those truths and rejecting their falsities, could help us understand that Humankind can, in fact, rebuild from within, that we are strong enough, and capable enough to change the world positively, exceptionally, and that we can (and will) do this for the long-term benefit of Humankind.  We have to imagine a new future from within.  So how can this be this be achieved?  How can we correctly change that which is destructive to our culture, society and Humankind as a whole?

CHANGE FROM WITHIN:  There is an “I” in US and that is ”U”
I’d like to suggest from this point on that “You” are the key to changing from within and helping Humankind determine what our fate will be.  You are the answer…  Only you can decide how “we” can change.  U must be the “I” voice in the “US” voice that changes what, who, and why we are.  YOU are the voice that matters, you are the voice that WILL make a difference… Speak up, shout it out, make your thoughts known… Because… YOU are the future, YOU are the now, and like it or not YOU are the past.  In other words, you are the power from within.  You are not without.  You are it, am, with, us, u, you, me, now, then, the future, the…

….  TBC - Dean

Violence as written for Prof. Dan O'Bryan, Sierra Nevada College


I rarely feel that violence is the answer, however, even Nelson Mandela agrees tat on occasion there is a time that peace can be achieved through civil unrest.  In the case of South Africa, for example, the oppressive rule of apartheid could only have ended through a violent revolution.  Violence must sometimes be met with violence.  Terror, however, is a totally completely different scenario.  The goal of terrorists is to strike fear in the hearts of opposing power.  Fear… fear, is NEVER the answer.  Therefore, to specifically answer your question, I cannot see a time that fear instilled in any people, for any reason, can ever be useful… well, perhaps useful for malicious selfish purposes, but, striking the fear and wrath of unimaginable punishment – particularly among innocent people never serves anyone but those wo inflict or instill it.  Fear of anything is never useful.

Eulogy for My Grandfather, as spoken by me.

Eulogy for my Grandfather 10-1-14


My grandfather was one of the most influential figures in my life.  Grandpa gave me more than money, more than gifts. More than love.  Grandpa gave me the spirit of entrepreneurship, the desire to fight for family, the knowledge that truth is always the best answer (even in sales), that integrity is the core foundation of business, that life is not about the answer, but the questioning of the status quo.  My grandfather was my single solitary biggest inspiration for how to start and run a business, and for how to learn from failure and never accept that just because something didn’t work out, doesn’t mean that it will never work out.  He taught me that the art of business extends into the art of patience.  And, I began learning all of this from Grandpa at an early age.  Here’s how he did it.
In life, Grandpa was always working… Sleeping in his home office for example, was both dedication to his work, and a welcome relief I suppose from Grandma’s snoring – although, I’m fairly certain, they woke each other up. 

As a child, I was treated to Grandpa’s expertise in entrepreneurship through farming.  I was lucky enough to ride with him during his visits to each ranch.  He would talk about grapes, grape sales, and teach me about how to deal with customers, clients and vendors, and we would walk out in the vineyards and inspect grapes, check on the status of vines that were both exceptional, and questionable.  And, during our trips into the field, Grandpa would show me how well he treated the lowest worker to the highest paid staff member.  And, he did this by treating everyone with respect from top to bottom, consistently across the board.  Know matter who you were, if he was talking to you, you knew you were number one.  And not just for that moment.  He thought, worked, and played about and with family, and in business, we were all his family.

If it seems like I’m talking to much about business, here’s why:

When I think of Grandpa, I have to admit to you how just how influential he was to me by telling you that I currently reside in Lake Tahoe because of our annual family pilgrimages to Club Tahoe.  The place has so much meaning to me that I currently live less than a block away from Club Tahoe.  I have a sort of spiritual connection to that exact place.  And here’s why.  The day I found out he was no longer with us, I just had to take a picture.  Of what?  Of the hole that still exists on the deck outside Club Tahoe Unit 38 which occurred when he burned a hole in it while BBQing with a hibachi.  Fun event.  But the thing is, the hole is still there!  They just covered it up with a piece of wood!  Don’t believe me?  I changed my FB profile picture to it.   But Tahoe and Grandpa combined have other meanings.
I remember, a time when my sister Nicole kind of jabbed Grandpa too hard while walking back from dinner, and how he stuffed her face in the snow which created a tremendous snowball fight.  I remember Grandpa telling me how bad the rain was during an el nino year and how much I secretly enjoyed the snow that resulted from it.  I remember meeting Grandma and Grandpa at the top of Squaw Valley for lunch, going to the Jacuzzi, playing pool, and I remember a time when grandpa played a little black jack after dinner one night, split aces, and won $1000 – which is to date the only $1000 bill I have ever seen.  Now, as an adult, I live, work and attend school as the only 40-year old student with a mission to earn a degree in both global business, and a minor in Ski resort management.  But, I’m doing these things in my life – because of my Grandfather’s foundation.  Because he always took time to say I love you with remarkable gifts like Lake Tahoe, educational experiences, and an endless supply of love.  And, because he laid the foundation for which I proudly hope to be at least ½ the man he was.

Integrity.  Honesty, and Love.  These were the core foundations from which I was educated by my grandfather.  And they were – to me – The mark of a good man.  The bible tells us that to truly be a man of God, one must be the following:  You must be:
Loving, Joyful, peaceful, patient, gentle, good, faithful, humble, and you must exercise self-control at all times. 
My grandfather was all of these things in all ways.  And, although I can talk about special occasions, fourth of July’s, my favorite Christmas gifts, or moments that were just he and I sitting alone in a vineyard talking about life… I choose not to.  I chose to say this instead.  That my grandfather, Keith Turner Ledbetter was – to re-coin a phrase my sister once used in an epic speech she gave that none of us will ever forget – Keith Turner Ledbetter was truly a remarkable man.

Foreign Policy Op-ed as written for INTB 350, Sierra Nevada College

“Lt. Gen. Ben Hodges conceded to reporters Tuesday [March 17th, 2015] that arming Ukraine could help its fragile pro-Western government on the battlefield, at least in the short term. But he [also] said that it wouldn’t be enough to fundamentally ensure that Ukraine doesn’t lose any more territory to Russia in the wake of Moscow’s annexation of Crimea last year.” (Unknown, Web).

The aforementioned statement intrigues me as I have recently been giving a great deal of thought to the idea that the United States is headed straight into (knowingly or unknowingly) a humanity devastating, globally transitional, internationally recognized global war… that will ultimately lead to world unification, globalization of economic flows, and a total restructuring of civilization as we currently know it.  In other words, we’re headed for a social change toward unification resulting from overpopulation, war, lack of infrastructure, degrading infrastructure, and change in the collective consciousness of humankind that edges us closer (and eventually we will become) to a unified human race that ultimately pulls together to create a… New World Order.

Arming Ukraine citizens is edging us closer to world war (and eventual global unification) because, if America really is striving for peace among nations through the UN, foreign policy, etc., the United States has a responsibility to protect its allies.  At the same time, Russia is theoretically the US’ ally (through the P5+1, etc.) thusly putting American foreign policy in a sticky situation.  Officials must ask themselves, “Should we arm Ukraine and risk a global war to protect our allies?  Or, should we let Ukraine fend for itself and watch our other ally (Russia) destroy…” It seems to go on and on like this forever.  It’s easy to understand why even the highest echelon US officials are having trouble answering the armament question in Ukraine.  According to ForiegnPolicy.com, “‘Providing weapons is not a strategy,’ Hodges said. ‘There are great arguments for giving weapons to them to help raise the cost for the Russian’s.  I think that is a valid argument.  But saying that’s a valid argument is different from saying that this ought to be the policy.’” (Unknown, Web).

Officials are confused, American citizens are confused, Russia is very obviously confused, and Ukraine is caught in the middle of it.  And, foreign policy was still born out of this indecisiveness because in March, 2015, The US sent weapons and boots to Ukraine, even though - at the time - the media (including ForeignPolicy.com) reported that, “Hodges’s comments highlight the difficult policy choices facing the White House, where a growing number of senior military officials and civilian officials have publically said in recent weeks that the United States should arm Ukraine.” (Unknown, Web).

So what was the policy then?  Boots on the ground, arm the Ukraine citizens, and stay neutral.  But, how do we stay out of a war between friends?  “Here, take these guns Ukraine and , Russia, you already have weapons so, you’re on your own.”  Then what?  Should the US say, “OK.  We’re gonna drop these weapons in, but from the air – we’re not going in – but, we need to train these guys how to fight you with our weapons so, here… Don’t start fighting until AFTER we get out.  OK… Ready… Set… Go!”  Something like that? We should make a song – Get Neutral, kind of like, We are the World.  Everybody holding hands, sitting on the sidelines, order hot dogs and, who knows… Kebabs or falafel while we watch as, sort of, curious onlookers.  It would be nice… I can envision the pageantry… then… in a few months… New administration in. old administration heads out quietly and says, “we’re out of here, you’re on your own with that.”  I guess, that’s how it will go…  Pass the buck.

That said, if the buck keeps passing along, the world goes further into turmoil… Well…  THE BUCK WILL STOP AT MY DESK, and never leave (should I ever have the privilege of attaining such an amazing responsibility)… Until we finish what should be done now.   Here’s what I would do in this situation (were I President now, and not in 2020 as I am currently planning)… Hindsight- it’s my year.        ;-)

• One: Talk with both countries in a neutral place like – Bolivia.  I say Bolivia because we have a great deal of influence in that region, but it theoretically could be held anywhere outside of the EU, Russia, and the US. 

• Two.  Discuss the issues. Three, Review and Translate into foreign policy (FP) according to Smart, Moral and Legal (FP mainstay doctrine). 
• Three, defer to Congress, the United Nations, and relevant international organizations, revealing outcomes to said organizations PRIOR to consideration of further action.  If answers were needed immediately – as was the case on 9/11 – This process would need to be accomplished real time. 

• FOUR.  Ready the ships.  Prepare for large scale war.  Monitor Russia.  Study troop movements.  Plan for ground assaults.  Plan invasion tactics.  Be prepared for a military outcome. 

• FIVE.  Negotiate again.  Get back to the drawing board and put the negotiating brainiacs to work! 

• SIX.  Notify the press that the US is prepared to take action, but wants both sides to negotiate before it becomes involved.

• SEVEN. Review results, refer to SML, take action.

Essentially, the US foreign policy needs to be fluid enough to have real time action plans, long term action plans, and an action plan that sits somewhere in the middle.  These plans have to be working in conjunction with each other at all times.  In order for this functionality to occur, a system has to be established that can accomplish this task by using all forms of technology available known and yet undiscovered.  Obama’s administration has an uphill fight to accomplish this over the next year and a half.  For it is on his watch, that future foreign policy will be built, and a New World Oder will begin.  What that new world looks like, remains to be seen.  Russia, Ukraine, and the US’ reaction will undoubtedly play an integral part in humanity’s future outcome.

Works Cited
Unknown. ForeignPolicy.com, http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/03/17/top-u-s-general-in-europe-arming-ukraine-isnt-a-strategy/ Web. 20015.

Community Based Resource Management as written for INTBL 484, Sierra Nevada College

Community Based Natural Resource Management

There is no question that service and giving back to the community you live in is extremely important, however, managing community resources is also a significant part of serving it.  However, in order to truly understand how best to serve the community through Community Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM), one must first determine what a community really is, and how CBNRM relates to it.  According to the CBNRM manual distributed by the Southern African Wildlife College, “The term ‘community’ despite being widely used in social science, is seldom clearly defined.  [However] There are a number of contexts that can help define what or who the community is.  Communities can be functionally defined in several ways such as: through representative structures; by area; common interest; ethnicity; affinity; resource user group or; land use.  Communities may be characterized by their variation (differences between social groups), variegation (diversification within social groups), and stratification (by wealth and power).  A community can [also] be defined by a shared system of values and moral codes which provide members with a sense of identity (Elna, SAWC).”  Therefore a community is a group of people that has a shared system of values, it can be diverse in ethnicity, but can be grouped together as broadly as people who live in a specific area.  Managing the resources within a community takes strategy, communication, and an understanding of the community’s needs, as well as an understanding of their environment.  CBNRM helps us understand how to do this and can be clearly defined as, “The substantial management of natural resource through returning control over or responsible authority for… resources to the community (Elna, SAWC).”   This means giving control of community based conservation, protected area outreach, collaborative management, and joint forest management back to the community members, rather than through government oversight and control.  Essentially, CBNRM practices give control of the environment back to the people.

“No community lives in isolation [rather it] is connected to others and to society in general.  Communities are also dynamic and change over time, as well as having different meanings for different people and at different times (Elna, SAWC).”  The result is an ever changing system that is essentially a globally connected system that must integrate with the group, the area, the region, the state, the continent, and the world.  This proves in fact that we (humankind) are connected to everyone, everything, everywhere.  In addition, it proves how complex CBNRM really is.  And it all begins within a small group, a small community of people through training, rural development, changing the collective consciousness within that group and small community, and encouraging the concepts of CBNRM to be spread throughout the region, the state, the continent, and the world.  No Easy task, but, it can be accomplished through education, and relating a common understanding as to why CBNRM is so important. 

CBNRM is important because, “Over the past two to three decades there has been a changing focus in rural development thinking from supply driven, ‘top down’ to participatory, demand driven and, ‘bottom up’ approaches [to CBNRM] (Elna, SAWC).”  And, “The important factor is that rights and responsibilities to use resources rest with the community (local) level rather than the state level (Elna, SAWC).”  Therefore, the impact a community has on society in general is exceptionally large.  For example, we often refer to ‘environmental impact’ or the human footprint as a way to relate to our impact on our local ecosystems.  Meaning what we do as individuals affects our community, the region, etc.  As a result, managing our local resources is essential to achieving a sustainable future.

There are several issues, however, “with using ‘community’ as an organizing principle for conservation [particularly] when we try to fit traditionally defined groups and systems into modern structures.  For example, in Zimbabwe, the local authority has three or more tiers, namely district, ward or division, and the village (Elna, SAWC).”  The result is a challenging system in which CBNRM becomes extraordinarily complex, and CBNRM experts are forced to educate all three tiers in order to effectively turn the management of resources over to the community.  However, working from the ground up, meaning the individual, to a small group, to the first tier, to the second tier, to the third tier, can be an effective way to educate the totality of the community about why CBNRM is so important, and once the total community has been educated, resource management can be turned over to local/ community control – which undoubtedly serves the community in a more effective way.  Ultimately, collaboration between CBNRM officials and the community is the key, and there are four essential characteristics that should be considered when trying to identify the best method for working together with a community.  “These are cohesion, legitimacy, delineation, and resilience (Elna, SAWC).” 

The term cohesion, “Refers to a sense of common identity and interest which brings people together and leads them to collectively differentiate themselves from others (Elna, SAWC).”  Usually cohesion refers to a shared history in which a community is forced to share resources due to political, economic, and/ or a shared history.  Therefore, cohesion is an important issue to consider because it is the ‘social glue’ that binds the community together, meaning CBNRM officials will have to learn, understand, and know how to work within the shared social structure of cohesion to effectively return CBNRM to the indigenous people within a specific area. 

The term demarcation, “is usually based on spatial criteria, marking out a fixed land area and the resources on it.  It may, however be drawn on the basis of socially authorized access to given resource categories, as in the case of pastoralism or some fisheries (Elna, SAWC).”  This means that CBNRM officials would be working in a specific geographic area, specific ecosystem, or within a specific social or socioeconomic area.  Therefore, demarcation is an effective way for CBNRM to return resource management to the group within the demarcated area.

Legitimacy, “Can be conferred by an external authority, but this on its own is not sufficient.  More important is internal legitimacy arising from socio-cultural and socio-economic criteria.  In many cases that provide legitimacy at the local level is at odds or in conflict with the criteria which modern… states impose on rural populations, and it is the persistence and adherence to them that creates tension and conflict (Elna, SAWC).”  Therefore, establishing legitimacy internally and externally is essential to returning resource management to the people within a community.  This can be done in several ways including working with government officials, working with local officials, and educating the local population. 

“Resilience and risk [can be defined as]… adaptive management (Elna, SAWC).”  It is now clear to CBNRM officials that, “In the rapidly changing world… the components of organizations are dynamic.  The roots of social cohesion may change in their substance and combinations.  Boundaries of jurisdiction and affiliation may shift. The sources of legitimacy may change. [Therefore,] Effective organizations must accommodate this change over time.  Resilience [therefore,] …is the right and capacity to adapt in content and structure, [thus] …allowing it to do so and is a key tool in the management of risk in uncertain environments and livelihood systems (Elna, SAWC).”  Ultimately this means that the world is an ever-changing place, and, the effective result is that CBNRM officials must work within, as well as understand the changing environment they are working in. 

Knowing what community is, and understanding the aforementioned characteristics, is a useful tool when turning CBNRM over to the people that are directly affected by, and effect the environment in a specific area.  However, understanding the concept of participation is equally important.  “The concept of participation is now firmly entrenched as a key principle in development and conservation theory and practice.    This is part of a fundamental shift in development thinking over the past twenty years, which has sought to move from being capital central to people centered, and based on the need for a radical shift in emphasis from external professionals to local people (Elna, SAWC).”  This means that CBNRM professionals are working from the ground up.  The local level is the priority because communities that understand what is at stake have been shown to make greater  strides in conservation. And, this is the case with almost anything.  To be more precise, when people understand how what they do to the environment affects them directly, communities tend to work more effectively together to accomplish the task at hand.  It is, therefore, understanding the direct impact that makes a difference.  In this way, getting a community to participate in action connects them directly to the effect of their actions thusly stimulating positive behavioral change.
In conclusion, Community Based Conservation has been around for decades.  From the pre-colonial era, to the colonial era, through current time, modern societies have recognized a need to conserve wildlife, conserve natural resources, and minimize the impact of human effects on rural, socioeconomic, and social communities.  The human footprint can change ecosystems, can bring invasive species to a community, can bring devastation, desecration, and harm to a community.  And, it is the responsibility of CBNRM professionals to educate communities about their impact, how it is harming their environment, as well as how to make the necessary changes that will help create a sustainable future for the community, which affects the region, which affects, the state, which affects the world.  Effective CBNRM provides a resource with a focused value, can result in differential benefits to a community, generates a positive correlation between management and quality of the benefit, benefits the unit of proprietorship, and helps small groups/ communities effectively manage their own resources.  It is through CBNRM that communities become aware of their impact, and it is through CBNRM that we can request legislative action, and it is through ground up CBNRM action that communities can create a sustainable future for their own unique ecosystem, the region, the state, and ultimately… the world.

Reference:
Professor Elna. Southern Africa Wildlife College (SAWC).  Community Based Natural Resource Management (CBNRM) handbook, 2015